12 Comments
User's avatar
rabbidave's avatar

It’s where the money is laundered.

Bill Cotter's avatar

BTW, what ever happened to Inspector Moss who ran BOSSI back in the 70’s and early 80’s.

Bill Cotter's avatar

You should have a link to the Somali Waltz.

Phil Hannum's avatar

Learned today that a Minnesota Concealed Carry permit holder cannot be under the influence of alcohol or controlled substances. Yesterday, I read how his parents, aware of his inclination to violence, encouraged him to be calm. Did he have disorders that we will be learning about? If he took prescribed, controlled substances, did the prescribing Doctor have knowledge of his carry permit?

Michael Law Cobb's avatar

Fraud center. Ohio, NY, Georgia and the big one California are up next. Expect more rioting.

MemeMaster's avatar

FBS. Frozen Brain Syndrome.

Joseph's avatar

Malversation :

The proper term for a public official deliberately wasting taxpayers' funds is malversation. This term refers to the misuse or misappropriation of public funds, particularly by individuals in public office, often involving unauthorized use for personal gain or purposes not intended by law. Other related terms include fraud, waste, and abuse, which can also describe similar actions, but malversation specifically pertains to the misuse of public resources.https://legalclarity.org/what-is-the-meaning-of-malversation-in-legal-terms/

Perpetual disqualification: Offenders may incur perpetual disqualification from holding public office.

Indemnification: Offenders are often required to indemnify the government for the misappropriated amount.

Additional penalties: These may include forfeiture of retirement benefits and revocation of honors or titles earned during tenure

Malversation is considered a serious crime, often grouped with other corruption offenses, emphasizing its harmful impact on public administration. In malversation through negligence, what characterizes the negligence is not what the offender did after the public funds or property were taken by another person but what the offender did or omitted to do which permitted the taking thereo

The Supreme Court Decides: It is hornbook doctrine that an acquittal will not necessarily extinguish civil liability unless the court declares in a final judgment that the fact from which the civil liability might arise did not exist.

DemonHunter's avatar

Not so certain having a barrel machined to accept a suppressor is illegal. Though the barrel did look to have a piston type connector device installed (also not illegal).

Suppressors are BATF regulated but quite legal.

Is there some other basis to support your claim that suppressors are “federally illegal”?

Paul Mauro's avatar

No — you are correct. We have updated it. Alas, have New York State so inculcated in our psyches, we tend to default to that…. (It is prohibited in NYS). Also updated: it is required to have the permit on your person when carrying a “pistol” in Minnesota. ID also required. We linked to the relevant statute.

DemonHunter's avatar

Minnesota was a “may issue” state for many years. Basically, only DAs with credible threats to their lives, which were verified, were issued a CCL. Glad they went to “shall.” In many states requiring a “permit” it actually looks like a DL. In Texas I’ve actually used my CCL as an ID before.

Paul Winter's avatar

made millions throwing peoples taxes away and Trump is now his butt buddy so Trump should look worse and right beside him