So here’s a question for these less than free men. Most retail establishments are not owned by the business owner, but a landlord, usually in some office miles away. And supposed that land owner chooses to not allow free men on “ their” properties? Interesting conundrum. I’m pretty sure there’s a reason our founders made the second amendment, and worded it in a way to leave no question.
And there's a reason it was second only to the revolutionary First Amendment. Sure, it was different times -- we all get that. But that's how seriously they took this right. My own prediction is that this gets struck down, at least in part.
So here’s a question for these less than free men. Most retail establishments are not owned by the business owner, but a landlord, usually in some office miles away. And supposed that land owner chooses to not allow free men on “ their” properties? Interesting conundrum. I’m pretty sure there’s a reason our founders made the second amendment, and worded it in a way to leave no question.
And there's a reason it was second only to the revolutionary First Amendment. Sure, it was different times -- we all get that. But that's how seriously they took this right. My own prediction is that this gets struck down, at least in part.
Excellent Paul