Let’s establish something right upfront: It seems Joe Biden’s health reports over the years are likely blatant lies to the American people. Many oncologists believe it would be highly unlikely that his doctor did not know about his cancer.
But recall: this was the same doctor who implied that Biden was cognitively sound. So who is this eminent physician?
The White House doctor under Joe Biden was Dr. Kevin O’Connor, an Army veteran of 22 years. He also worked for 10 years in the White House as Joe Biden’s personal physician. A graduate of St. Bonaventure University, he went on to earn a degree in Osteopathic Medicine from the New York Institute of Technology. He is a D.O (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, not an M.D, as is Trump’s doctor). And no offense, but those schools are not exactly Harvard or Johns Hopkins.
So what is the difference between a traditional medical doctor and an osteopathic doctor? According to the Medical University of the Americas:
MDs practice an allopathic approach to care, focusing on contemporary, research-based medicine to treat and manage various conditions. This is seen as the scientific approach to diagnosing and treating medical conditions, while osteopathy adopts a holistic, mind-body-spirit approach, focusing on preventative care.
We’ll just leave that there.
What endeared Dr. O’Connor to the Biden family such that they trusted him with the President’s health? O’Connor appears to be as much a politician as Biden himself. He has donated to the political campaigns of Democrat politicians, Biden family associates, and Joe Biden himself. He was a paid campaign worker for Biden’s successful 2020 election bid.
He was also heavily involved in James Biden’s shady Americore dealings. James Biden testified that O’Connor helped move a project with the Veterans Administration forward, introducing him to a group of PTSD specialists. O’Connor also helped broker a deal for the purchase of the now-shuttered Ellwood City Hospital. That deal is under federal investigation.
Dr. Kevin O’Connor seems like a man who can be trusted to keep a secret.
Granted, O’Connor also helped the Biden family through the tragic illness and death of Beau Biden. During that time, O’Connor became very close with Jill Biden. Former White House doctor Ronny Jackson stated, “Kevin O’Connor is like a son to Jill Biden – she loves him.” Some claim that O’Connor downplayed and mismanaged Beau Biden’s cancer, not ordering tests that may have caught the cancer early and giving an optimistic outlook when the prognosis was grim.
We would not be surprised if Jill and the good doctor were both fully aware of Joe Biden’s cancer situation. The White House physician certainly should have been aware that the President had a metastasizing cancer. It seems that, at best, the two kept this medical condition from the American people. At worst, they let the President’s work and abortive 2024 election bid affect his treatment.
If Dr. O’Connor and Jill Biden were aware of the severity of President Biden’s medical condition, did they let Joe in on the prognosis? It seems hard to imagine that Joe Biden would be fighting tooth and nail to win another four-year term at the age of 81 and with a potentially fatal cancer diagnosis.
Jill Biden really seemed to be the force behind keeping Joe in the seat of power, despite all indications that he was non compos mentis and in frail physical condition. It took a cabal of Democrat powerbrokers, led by Nancy Pelosi, to wrest the nomination out of Joe Biden’s death grip.
We think it is time we got some straight answers out of Dr. Kevin O’Connor. That should come from Congress, the FBI, and the American Medical Association.
Now, HIPAA laws would be an impediment to an investigation – they even apply for 50 years post-mortem. So Biden would likely need to sign a waiver.
But if it can be shown that O’Connor committed a criminal act in his medical treatment, or lack thereof, HIPAA protections could go out the window. A federal judge or Congress could subpoena the medical records. That has the potential to make the coverup of Biden’s mental status look like a little white lie.
We wish the former President well in the fight for his life. Joe Biden is, if nothing else, a fighter and an American.
We hope the people around him ensure he gets the best treatment for a long and healthy life.
And we hope the country he “led” for four years finally gets some answers.
The Dems’ Dilemma
So what on earth can the Democrats say now about Joe Biden’s health? Doctors on both sides of the aisle agree that there is no way that Biden’s cancer could have come on so quickly, in light of how it has reportedly spread throughout his body.
As a result, the Republicans will almost certainly add this mystery to their inquiry into who ran America for four years.
So where is this going?
First off, as Chris notes above, HIPPA laws (which protect a patient’s privacy) extend even beyond the death of that patient. They certainly protect Joe Biden now.
However, HIPPA laws can be overcome with legal process — like, for instance, a subpoena from Congress.
But a faster way to get to Joe Biden’s health information would be to just… ask him. Ask the former President to either provide the records or to sign a HIPPA waiver, giving consent for the release of pertinent health records.
If Joe says no to that, the inevitable optic is: What are you hiding?
Republicans will then issue the subpoenas anyway — with the truth eventually coming to light. The most Joe and the left can likely gain is some time.
Any effort to quash those subpoenas will look even worse. Like, for instance, if those around Joe were to say he is not capable of giving knowledgable, voluntary consent. If they go that route, it calls into question every decision Joe made — including the pardons and any executive orders.
In the meantime, the Dem leadership keeps intoning, “We’re looking forward.” In response to questioning, Schumer and Jeffries have both used that term now, in the space of days. Clearly, this is the new DNC sheet music.
You know who says, “we’re looking forward”? Teams that just finished in last place.
I’m not sure the Democrat brand is reparable without a total swap-out of their current leadership. It just keeps getting worse.
New Orleans Jailbreak Proves It: Federal Consent Decrees Are Abused And Overused
The recent escape of ten inmates from a New Orleans jail is the latest wake-up call proving that federal consent decrees do more harm than good when it comes to public safety. The jail, part of the Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office system, has operated under a federal consent decree since 2013—a full twelve years of federal oversight with little to show in terms of competence, safety, or accountability.
This wasn’t a jailbreak from a maximum-security fortress. These inmates—including several facing charges for violent felonies, including murder—simply walked out of a minimum-security facility, and it was hours before they were even noticed missing. As of this writing, multiple escapees remain at large.
Consent decrees were originally intended as a way to reform abusive or corrupt police and correctional systems. But in practice, they often become sprawling bureaucratic disasters. Expensive, unaccountable, and slow to adapt, they tie the hands of local officials while encouraging a mindset of avoidance rather than enforcement.
Adding insult to injury, the so-called federal “monitor” of these consent decrees is usually a private law firm—one that bills taxpayers for millions of dollars in oversight fees. These firms have no incentive to wrap things up quickly, and every delay becomes another invoice paid by the public, not for safety or reform, but for paper-pushing and partner bonuses.
The truth is, once instituted, federal monitorships become essentially interminable, with new “concerns” surfacing from the worthies-in-charge whenever the decree is in danger of actually expiring. Some will literally go on for decades.
That’s why, under the Trump administration, an Executive Order was issued last month to review and wind down federal consent decrees imposed on law enforcement agencies across the country. The rationale was simple: let local officials do their job without long-distance interference from Washington lawyers and ideologues who have no stake in the neighborhoods affected.
The New Orleans debacle offers a textbook case in how these agreements backfire. The consent decree for the jail, overseen by a federal judge and an out-of-town monitor, was supposed to improve conditions. Instead, it has delivered chronic understaffing, poor morale, and a culture of indecision. Because one result of consent decrees is often the inability to answer a simple, vital question: Who is running things?
All of this is unfolding as progressive politicians continue pushing the “decarceration” movement nationwide—another ideological train wreck that treats fewer jail beds as moral progress, regardless of public safety consequences.
At some point, we have to admit the obvious: systems engineered by federal judges, consultants, and law firms aren’t delivering safety or reform. They're delivering escapes, lawsuits, and public distrust.
The left’s obsession with decarceration and federal micromanagement is proving to be just another failed experiment in soft-on-crime governance. New Orleans just became its latest victim.
And finally…
They’ll be blaming Biden’s illness on Musk anyday now.
The Doctor, doctors, knew, but did Biden know? I don’t believe he was capable of keeping it secret for 4 years. Did they hide it, therefore needed treatment, from him? Just asking.
Treason