Playback speed
×
Share post
Share post at current time
Share from 0:00
0:00
/
Cross-posted by The Ops Desk with Paul Mauro
"Brave, naive, or both? Paul Mauro’s October 8 piece raises a question that the Cornell Seven controversy’s loudest voices would rather avoid: could Jane Doe accuser Lucy Craig regret filing her civil lawsuit as more information emerges? His take deserves attention because seeking damages also invites scrutiny of the account supporting that demand. Evidence that complicates the public narrative could change how readers understand the encounter, Cornell’s response, and the original investigation. That possibility challenges the assumption that filing a complaint ends the factual argument. Mauro’s warning concerns what happens when the story faces examination.
https://lucycraig.blog/"


